Tag: HEMO

Posted on

Fellow-level lecture on urea kinetics

I reworked an old lecture from ’05 on urea kinetics. The old lecture had a hideous purple background, so changing that to black would have been enough but I added a number of cool touches to fully update it. It worked pretty well, though the end’s pacing is off.

PowerPoint | PDF

I especially like the sequence walking through using the iPhone to calculate the simplified single pool Kt/V. Its amazing how many people don’t realize that turning the calculator sideways brings up scientific functions. I love watching their faces light up when I say, “Now turn it sideways.”

The lecture uses the three randomized controlled trials on dialysis to introduce and explain the three varieties of Kt/V:
  1. NCDS: to discuss single pool Kt/V
  2. HEMO: to discuss equilibrated Kt/V
  3. Frequent Hemodialysis Network in center study: to discuss standard Kt/V
I have another hour long time slot in December to talk about dialysis prescription. I’m going to discuss the recent data on dialysis interval and mortality. 
What else should I talk about?

Posted on

Just gave grand rounds on hemodialysis

The title for the talk was dialysis for the internist and I focused on recent advances in the field of hemodialysis including:

  • Plavix for fistula maturation. Doesn’t work.
  • Aggrenox for graft preservation. Does work.
  • HeRO grafts for patients with central venous stenosis
  • Poor outcomes for nursing home patients started on dialysis
  • Poor outcomes for the elderly on dialysis
  • Evidence base for selecting conservative care rather than dialysis
  • Early versus late start for dialysis
  • Frequent hemodialysis
  • APOL1 as the cause of increased risk for kidney disease among African Americans
Keynote has a feature that allows people using Safari to view the presentation. Here it goes. We’ll see if this works. Otherwise, the PDF and Keynote files will be available under the Lecture Tab.

Here is a video of me giving the lecture. I’m working on putting together a formal slidecast but the video was a WMV. What a hassle.


Hemodialysis for the Internist. An Update from joel topf on Vimeo.

Posted on

Monday was the highest traffic day on this site. Ever.

My post on Everything I learned in fellowship is wrong was featured on the home page of renalWEB.

It feels weird that my post was listed at the top under “News Headlines.” The ATN article came out in July and I just got around to writing about it six months later. I wrote it so that when I discuss the findings on rounds, I have a way to quickly find an abstract of the study with my personal observations. And I will discuss it with the fellows because even though the study was a negative study it is a benchmark study in nephrology. The article is a negative study but it is negative in the way that HEMO was negative, not the way that DCOR was.

  • HEMO is usually listed as a disappointing study because we were not able to help patients by ratcheting up their dose of dialysis from 1.16 to 1.53 (eKt/V).
    But as Glen Chertow argued persuasively, the HEMO trial was a triumph of evidence based medicine. We were able to definitively argue against the desire to incrementally enhance three-times a week day-time dialysis. The increasing evidence for daily and in-center nocturnal dialysis are by-products of the failure of HEMO. If HEMO had been a positive trial we would probably be focusing on a HEMO II with a targetted eKt/V of 1.8. The negative result has sparked innovation and a search for novel ideas.
  • DCOR on the other hand has almost nothing definitive to show despite being “the largest outcomes study ever done in the hemodialysis population.” The failure of DCOR can be attributed to a low event rate, a high but undefined cross-over rate and a 50% drop-out rate. All of these conspired to produce an under-powered study and clinicians are left in a sea of phosphorous binder marketing without near term hope for better guidance.

So the negative finding of the ATN group advances the science of nephrology, removes an important question and will allow us to move on to new strategies to help patients with acute kidney injury.

A final note to the editor of RenalWEB, my bullet on the dose of dialysis referred to the HEMO trial, which did not look at frequency of dialysis or radical increases in dose. The jury is still out on those techniques but I’m with you. Those two strategies seem right and beneficial.