OUWB Starling forces question


I was hoping I could ask you a few questions. I’m finding there is a lottttt of contradictory information.

  1. According to starling forces, decreased plasma oncotic pressure should increase GFR, but according to nephrotic syndrome, decreased albumin will cause edema and overall decrease GFR. Which one should I believe? 
  2. In general, it’s said that AT2 at low levels dilates the afferent arteriole to increase GFR, but at high level it constricts both efferent and afferent to decrease GFR. However, the SNS, which stimulates renin, constricts all arterioles in the body as well as activates the RAAS system. How does that work? Is the SNS more immediate until the aldosterone system is ready to say okay go ahead and dilate the afferent I’m ready to take up the water anyway? 
  3. This is a very basic question but sometimes I have moments of self doubt and this is one of them: So we always say edema is fluid buildup in ISF due to increased hydrostatic or decreased oncotic pressure (like nephritic syndrome hypoalbumineia) right? So why does fluid build up in ISF as opposed to go inside the cell where I guess technically there is more stuff to pull it in? 
  4. How does K suppress ammonia genesis? 

Thank you very much!

Let’s take these one by one,

NUMBER ONE
Nephrotic syndrome and GFR. Don’t connect those neurons. Proteinuria does not cause an immediate and hemodynamic change in GFR that is clinically meaningful. Yes, you are right that lower oncotic pressure should increase GFR, but those increases in GFR will be trimmed by tubuloglomerular feedback so that in the end there is not a meaningful change in GFR. Likewise the nephrotic syndrome will cause fluid to leak from the blood vessels decreasing effective circulating volume lowering renal plasma flow. However, once again these changes in volume are small enough that the kidney easily compensates with changes in AT2, PGE, filtration fraction, etc so that GFR remains stable.

Over a long time, proteinuria causes chronic kidney disease and decreases renal function, but not by the mechanisms you described.

Of note the model you are talking about with nephrotic syndrome causing fluid to leave the blood vessels and that resulting in decreased perfusion of the kidney is a model called underfill hypothesis of edema in nephrotic syndrome. Most nephrologists now ascribe by the overfill hypothesis which states that the primary abnormality is not loss of fluid from the capillaries from the decreased albumin, but increased sodium absorption by the diseased kidney. This results in volume overload and that causes the edema.
NUMBER TWO
As I understand it, angiotensin is only a vasoconstrictor. The proximal tubule is dilated by prostaglandin E. In volume depletion there is release of renin which activates angiotensin 2 (with help of angiotensin converting enzyme). Angiotensin 2 vasoconstricts both the afferent arteriole and efferent arteriole. But since the afferent arteriole is so much bigger to begin with, after the angiotensin 2 induced vasoconstriction the resistance in the afferent arteriole is less than the resistance in the efferent arteriole, this serves to increase the intraglomerular pressure, forcing more plasma through the glomerular slit membranes and increasing the filtration fraction and maintaining GFR in the face of volume depletion.
And yes the SNS is more immediate and the renin angiotensin aldosterone system is a bit slower.
NUMBER THREE
Where fluid builds up depends on what is being altered. In nephrotic syndrome, the (underfill) theory states (I’m an overfill believer) that decreased plasma albumin lowers the oncotic pressure drawing fluid from the interstium back into the capillaries at the venous end. This means more of the fluid remains in the interstium leading to edema. The oncotic agent of note here is albumin which determines the flux of fluid between the interstitial and plasma compartment.
In order to shift fluid between the intracellular and extracellular compartments you would need to change sodium and potassium which are the chief osmotically active particles of interest between those two compartments.
NUMBER FOUR
Hyperkalemia causes potassium to shift into the cells. To maintain electroneutrality hydrogen leaves the cell. One cation in, one cation out. The loss of hydrogen ions makes the cell alkalotic. This rise in pH tricks the proximal tubule cell into believing the entire body is suffering from metabolic alkalosis and since ammonia generation is used to increase hydrogen excretion, and correct metabolic acidosis, metabolic alkalosis shuts down ammonia generation.

Lupus nephritis, MMF and maintenance therapy

I love it when I have a clinical question and I’m able to find a well executed study that’s exactly fits my question. It’s like fitting the last piece of a puzzle.

A year ago I was referred a patient with heavy proteinuria. Initial assessment showed 7 grams of proteinuria, a cholesterol over 300, edema and an albumin of 0.7. Classic nephrotic syndrome.

Before he returned for his first follow-up appointment disaster struck. He developed chest pain and shortness of breath from a pulmonary embolism. This was a patient my age, two kids, professional. Looking at him was like looking in the mirror, but for the grace of G-d that could be me sitting in that exam chair.

black arrow points to tubuloreticular inclusions
seen in SLE and HIV.

After a month of anti-coagulation I was able to convince pulmonology and hematology to reverse the Coumadin for a few hours to get a kidney biopsy. It was membranous nephropathy with endothelial tubuloreticular inclusions. Along with consistent ANA and DS DNA we made a diagnosis of SLE WHO V and began mycophenolate mofetil. We titrated the MMF up to 3g a day and after 6 months he was in remission.

After a few months of sub nephrotic proteinuria, a normal albumin and a year of anti-coagulation he stopped his Coumadin. He has weaned his prednisone to 10 mg every other day and stopped the alendronate and rosuvastatin. Now he wants to get off the mycophenolate. Given how frightening the PE was, my preference would be to treat him forever. I casually surveyed my peers and got answers as varied as:

  • I never lower the MMF, every time I do the patient relapses
  • I taper it off after 6 months of remission

When I consulted the literature to look into this I found this paper:

Bingo. They maintained patients on MMF for 3 years at 2 grams a day with excellent results. 

Importantly there were no deaths, only 10% had serious infections and no cases of cancer occurred with the mycophenolate. 
Looks like an acceptably benign therapy with good outcomes.
Aside: While looking up how to spell endothelial tubuloreticular inclusions, I came across this paper (how I love you so Google) showing a significant number of patients with endothelial tubuloreticular inclusions that did not have lupus or HIV. I was taught that these EM findings were essentially pathognomonic for lupus. Interesting.
UPDATE: a second trial, the MAINTAIN trial (PDF), showed almost identical results. Included for completeness. 

Renal Disease in Pregnancy, an annotated bibliography

Here’s an article on a placental site tumor resulting in secondary membranous nephropathy. More a curiosity than truly relevent as the diagnosis was made after delivery.

Also don’t forget the review of renal biopsy in pregnancy I did a week ago. I reviewed this article.

Sebestyen presents an interesting case. The patient first presented with proteinuria during her third trimester and undergoes a cesarian section at 36 weeks due to pre-eclampsia. At the time she had 3 grams of proteinuria on a 24-hour sample and a blood pressure of 170/100. Six weeks after delivery her blood pressure returned to normal but she remained proteinuric. She ultimatly had a kidney biopsy and was diagnosed with membranous glomerulonephritis. The patient was non-adherent with her treatment and variously treated with cyclosporin, cyclophosphamide and steroids. She aborted a pregnancy at 11 weeks due to cyclosporin exposure. [It is fascinating reading the literature and appreciating the widely varying recommendations and practices regarding the fetal toxicity of renal therapeutics]
The patient was lost to follow-up until she presented at 22 weeks gestation in a third pregnancy with nephrotic syndrome (5g in 24 hours), hypertension and decreasing renal function. The fetus was eutrophic (50% for femur length and biparietal diameter. Explanation).
The patient was started on daily methylprednisolone 16 mg and azathioprine 100 mg. Additionally she was treated with antihypertensives and diuretics. Subsequently the methylprednisolone dose was increased to 32 mg and then to 64 mg/day. Albumin was added to the diuretics. The patient did well until the 29th week when the albumin began to fall. They noted decreased fetal growth rate. In the 33rd week, fetal growth stopped and the patient went for cesarean section. A small for gestational age but otherwise healthy boy was delivered. The boy needed a few days of oxygen and was discharged home after 21 days.
After the patient stopped breast feeding (the article used the term ablactation, new one for me) she started cyclophosphamide and ACEi and went into remission within 3 months. Her subsequent history was marked by multiple relapses and ultimately end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis.
The authors felt this patient was remarkable for the use of a lower dose of steroids, 250 mg methylprednisolone pulses rather than 1g pulses. They felt the lower doses allowed them to avoid some of the side effects of glococorticoids:
  • Intrauterine growth retardation (that’s a stretch since the kid was small for gestational age)
  • Suppression of fetal adrenal glands
  • Periventricular leukomlacia
They attribute the success of the low dose steroids to the use of azathioprine, which is not absolutely contraindicated after the twelfth week.
I am skeptical of the claim that they were able to effectively control symptoms with the lower dose steroids and azathioprine. It looks to me like the patient has progressive worsening of the blood pressure, albumin, proteinuria and renal function. The decrease in the proteinuria may have more to do with the decrease in the GFR than the effectiveness of the therapy.
Malik et al. Repeated pregnancies in patients with primary membranous glomerulonephritis. Nephron (2002) vol. 91 (1) pp. 21-4
Malik presents a retrospective study on patients with MGN with multiple pregnancies with the hypothesis that repeated pregnancies worsen the prognosis of membranous nephropathy and increase the danger of pregnancy. Nine patients and 51 pregnancies were reviewed, 30 of the pregnancies were after the diagnosis of MGN and 21 were before.
All the patients came from a single tertiary care hospital and had their biopsies from May 1985 to December 1997. None of the patients had a renal biopsy during pregnancy.
The first table shows the gross outcomes for the pregnancies:
The data looks pretty promising. One women, patient 6, had terrible pregnancy outcomes:
  1. Fetal loss at 37 weeks associated with pre-eclampsia in the first pregnancy
  2. Spontneous abortion prior to 22 weeks with the second pregnancy
  3. Live-birth complicated by prematurity, pre-eclampsia and cesarean sections. Infant with low birthweight.
  4. Live-birth complicated by prematurity, pre-eclampsia and cesarean sections. Infant with low birthweight.
Outside of patient 6, there was only 1 pre-mature infant with a cesarian section in 26 pregnancies. No fetal deaths and no spontaneous abortions. 
Looking at the progression of renal disease that might have been induced by the pregnancy the data is likewise reassuring. The authors could find no increase in proteinuria or serum creatinine. Only one mother had hypertension and the worst serum Cr was 2.5 mg/dL in patient 5.
The authors conclude:
…the outcome of repeated pregnancies in patients with MGN is good with 90% live births. Repeated pregnancies do not influence the course of MGN.
This report looks great. It never mentions what type of therapy, if any, the patients received. The authors also mentioned that patients with more severe renal disease may have been routed to a different hospital that was a center of excellence in renal disease, suggesting possible selection bias to more mild cases.
References of interest
  1. Abe S et al. The influence of antecedent renal disease on pregnancy Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153: 508-514. 
  2. Jungers Membranous glomerulobephritis and Pregnancy. Clin Nephrol 1988; 29: 106-107
  3. Surian M et al. Glomerular disease in patients with primary and secondary glomerular diseases Nephron 1984; 36:101-105.
Barcelo et al. Successful pregnancy in primary glomerular disease. Kidney Internationsl (1986) vol. 30 (6) pp. 914-9
Barcelo examined 66 pregnancies in 48 women from 1972 to 1981. All of the women had primary glomerular disease. The distribution was:
  • MPGN 16
  • FSGS 13
  • IgA 10
  • MGN 7
  • Focal nephritis 2
The pregancy outcome were generally very good, with MPGN having the worst outcomes. In the 9 pregnancies with membranous nephropathy, 7 were full term, 2 were premature. No fetal deaths.
When looking at proteinuria, the authors found a inverse linear correlation between proteinuria and fetal weight. 
The authors noted an increase in obstetric complications with three risk factors: renal failure, nephrotic syndrome and hypertension:
The incidence of obstetric complications varied with the presence or absence of risk factors. Women with low proteinuria (≤2.5 g/24 hours), without hypertension or renal failure had a low complication rate: 2.8% (one still birth). In the nephrotic syndrome, obstetric complications reached 33% of the pregnancies (pre-term), the same as with moderate renal failure (33% abortion, pre-term) and lower than women with hypertension (62% of the pregnancies, abortion, pre-term).
The authors employed a matched control group to try to assess any progression of renal disease induced by the pregnancy. Like Malik, they were unable to show any damage or worsening of renal prognosis due to the pregnancy. No significant differences between the pregnant and control groups.
The authors concluded that primary glomerular disease was associated with adequate fetal outcomes without damaging the mothers’ prognosis. They speculate that the correlation of proteinuria to birthweight may be due to decreased placental perfusion from intravascular volume depletion from the loss of oncotic pressure.
The authors conclude with a twisted double negative meant to maximally confuse the reader:
The high fetal survival rate and the lack of repercussions of pregnancy on maternal nephropathy in the majority of women reported here indicate that pregnancy in patients with primary glomerulonephritis, glomerulosclerosis without hypertension, or significant renal function impairment should not be advised against. On the other hand, it should be kept in mind that coexistent hypertension worsens the prognosis, and the nephrotic syndrome increases the incidence of pre-term deliveries and low birth weight infants, although fetal viability is not markedly affected.
From the department of “Some docs will try anything” comes this case report of a patient who presents with membranous nephropathy at 9 weeks gestation. She had 21 grams of protein and was started on cyclosporine.  [It is fascinating reading the literature and appreciating the widely varying recommendations and practices regarding the fetal toxicity of renal therapeutics] The patient had an albumin of 1.4. The physicians did a full thrombophilia work-up and found elevated levels of lipoprotein A and fibrinogen. Based on these results they started the patient on prophylactic Lovenox (1.5 mg/kg/d).
At 26 weeks, the patient developed back and flank pain. Ultrasound showed right renal vein thrombosis with extension into the inferior vena cava. The patient was then switched to unfractionated heparin 10 units/kg/hr and a t-PA infusion.
The thrombolytics were working and daily ultrasounds showed progressive reductions in clot volume. On the seventh day, however, the fetal heart rate slowed and the patient went for emergency cesarean section. They stopped the t-PA and heparin in the OR. The baby was born at 720 g, and did well enough to be extubated after 18 days and go home neurologically intact 83 days after birth.
The mother’s course was complicated by 800 mL of blood loss (amazingly little if you think about it), anemia and hypertension but, likewise did well.
I’m trying to draw lessons from this case and the only ones that jump out at me are that heavy proteinuria can cause renal thrombosis in membranous, just like as in non-pregnant patients, and that prophylactic LMW heparin failed, at least in this case. 
Katzir et al. Pregnancy in membranous glomerulonephritis–course, treatment and outcome. Clin Nephrol (2004) vol. 61 (1) pp. 59-62
Katzir presents a case of a 23 y.o. primigravid with previously diagnosed membranous nephropathy stage III/IV, who was admitted at 14 weeks gestation. The patient had initially been diagnosed with membranous at age of 14. She went into complete remission following use of the Ponticelli regimen (true Ponticelli, with alternating chlorambucil and steroids). She had been in remission for more than a year prior to getting pregnant.
Seven weeks into the pregnancy she developed hypertension (160/90) with 1.5 grams of protein on a 24-hour sample. She responded to methyldopa and a low-salt diet (135/70).
At 14 weeks, the patient was readmitted with symptomatic hypertension (160/100). At that time she had 10.6 grams of protein on a 24-hour sample, an albumin of 2.1, and a cholesterol of 324 mg/dL. Renal function remained normal. After informed consent they started IV methylprednisolone 1g a day for 3 days followed by 50 mg a day of prednisone for 4 weeks. This resulted in improved blood pressure, loss of facial edema and a decrease in proteinuria to 6g/day and an increase in albumin to 2.5 g/dL. 
The patient had a second 3 day pulse of 1 gram of methylprednisolone and then oral prednisolone 60 mg every other day. After the second month of therapy, 26th week gestation, the albumin rose to 2.9 g/dL and the proteinuria was down to 4.8 g/24-hours, and the blood pressure was down to 135/80.
At 34 weeks gestation was readmitted with hypertension and uterine cramps. She was induced and delivered by cesarian section. The infant did well and was healthy at 1 year follow-up.
This looks like an effective treatment of membranous nephropathy in pregnancy, in my eyes more compelling than the Sebestyen case report of lower dose steroids and azathioprine. Steroids alone are generally considered ineffective in membranous, hence the use of Ponteceli regimen and tacrolimus as the standard of care. I would describe the steroid pulses as a means to prolong the pregnancy to get the fetus to viability and after delivery allow the mother to seek definitive care.
Packham et al. Membranous glomerulonephritis and pregnancy. Clin Nephrol (1987) vol. 28 (2) pp. 56-64
Packham reviews 33 pregnancies in 24 women with membranous nephropathy.
  • 17 women initially presented during pregnancy
  • 7 women had the diagnosis ante-partum
Of the women who presented during pregnancy 11 of them, received biopsies at the end of the first trimester.
In the 33 pregnancies the outcomes were not as rosy as other studies have shown:
  • 8 pregnancies resulted in fetal death (24%)
    • 6 occurred in the first trimester
    • 3 spontaneous abortions (1 at 14 weeks, 2 in the first 12 weeks)
    • 4 therapeutic abortions
    • 1 still birth at 22 weeks
  • 14 pregnancies resulted in premature infant (32-36 weeks)
    • 60% of pregnancies that went beyond the first trimester had premature delivery
    • 2 babies were born before 32 weeks
  • Two congenital abnormalities
    • hydrocephalus (one of the therapeutic abortions)
    • hare lip
The mother’s outcomes were relatively benign
  • three patients had decrease in renal function
    • 1 lost half of her kidney function, the loss persisted after delivery but remained stable on azathioprine and warfarin. The patient ultimatly stopped those drugs and progressed to ESRD
    • 1 mother had a twin pregnancy and was diagnosed with mild membranous in the first trimester. At 34-weeks she developed ARF, severe hypertension. She was induced and after delivery went for a repeat kidney biopsy which demonstrated crescentic GN. The patient was treated with cyxlophosphamie and had a good outcome with stable renal function.
    • 1 mother had worsening renal function at 14 weeks. Her biopsy revealed fibrinoid crescents. She later spontaneously aborted the fetus. Renal function later normalized.
  • Hypertension occurred in 15 (46%) of the pregnancies.
    • usually in the third trimester
    • resolved after delivery in all but 3 women.
The authors felt that proteinuria was the most important risk factor:
In this, the largest study ever done on membranous nephropathy the authors found, outcomes worse in both the fetus and mothers. This may be attributable to the length of the study. The authors commented that neonatal treatment and anti-hypertensive therapies have gotten much better and this may explain the fact that no child or fetus died after  1975 (the patients were collected from 1964-1986).
Lindheimer and Katz. Gestation in women with kidney disease: prognosis and management. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol (1994) vol. 8 (2) pp. 387-404.
Lindheimer and Katz. Two of the biggest characters in my fellowship at University of Chicago. Whenever I was with them they would trade stories that left them both in stitches and mostly bewildered me. Adrian Katz was my mentor in clinic for my first year of fellowship and his last year of clinical medicine. It was an interesting pairing.
This is a book chapter masquerading as a journal article. It’s huge. The chapter leads off with three conclusions the authors derived from reviewing 9 articles covering over 1,000 pregnancies:
  1. women with renal disease but ony mild decreases in renal function and normal blood pressure at conception will do well and the pregnancy does not adversly affect their renal prognosis. They specifically exclude lupus, MPGN, scleroderma and pariarteritis from this conclusion.
  2. If the patient has a creatinine ≥1.5 and >3 mg/dl or hypertension at conception about a third of patients will lose further renal function during pregnancy and have further loss of function post-partum.
  3. Women with a creatinine ≥3 mg/dl are frequently infertile and when they do conceive the liklihood of a successful outcome is low with high maternal morbidity.
The remainder of the chapter/article goes on to provide data to support the above conclusions. They lead off reviewing Katz’s own article from 1980 covering 121 pregnancies with intact renal function (Cr ≤ 1.4) and normal blood pressure (ony 20% had hypertension). The series excluded lupus nephritis. The outcomes are summarized below and have excellent outcomes:
The graph on the left is pregnancy outcome, on the right is the long-term follow-up for the mothers.
Ptoteinuria was common and was often nehrotic range. Katz found that the prpteinuria was usually well tolerated and did not influence the pregnancy outcome.
  • 121 pregnancies
  • 5 still births
  • 6 neonatal deaths
  • 91% success rate
Impressive, especially considering that most of these deliveries were in the 60’s and 70’s. He quotes a study by Abe, with more contemporary neonatal care that noted no perinatal deaths in mothers with IgA despite 20% preterm deliveries. 76% of the infants were of adequate size for gestational age, so renal disease does not necessarily result in small babies.
The 5 patients that ended up oin ESRD did so 2-8 years after the pregnancy and their diagnosis was a rogues gallery of renal badness: amyloidosis, FSGS, ADPKD, and 2 cases of crescentic GN.
Then this table. Wow that is awesome:
This table summarizes the 6 studies published after Katz’s 1980 article and generally support Katz’s initial conclusion that as long as the renal function is pretty good and the blood pressure is okay going into pregnancy the outcomes are acceptable.
The article looks at the data on IgA nephropathy, where there is some controversy. A number of authors (Kincaid-Smith,  Becker GJPackham 1234) have reported worsening of proteinuria, blood pressure and renal function during pregnancy. This was associated with fetal loss in 27% and on biopsy, woman who had a history of pregnancy tended to have more severe lesions. Other studies have shown beter outcomes with IgA and a lack of adverse outcomes compared to their nulliparous peers:
So Katz and Lindheimer conclude that for IgA:
Thus the observations of most investigators is that women with IgA nephropathy who are normotensive and have preserved renal function should anticipate few problems and that there is no convincing evidence linking gestation to progression of their disease.
The authors then describe some conflicting data on FSGS but generally reinforce their initial conclusions that patients with intact renal function be counseled that pregnancy is generally safe and a good outcome should be expected.
Lupus is a condition where, if the disease has been active in the 6 months prior to pregnancy, the prognosis is more guarded. They also mention a progressive post-partum renal failure due to thrombotic lesions in patients with anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome.
The authors feel that woman with scleroderma or periarteritis should be counseled against pregnancy and go as far as suggesting therapeutic abortions if the condition is present in the first trimester. Successful pregnancies with scleroderma have been managed with ACEi, a drug considered to be teratogenic.
The chapter then discusses women with more severe renal disease going into pregnancy. Bear and Kincaid-Smith (unable to find the ref) both reported permanent and severe losses of renal function associated with pregnancy in roughly haf the pregnancies. More contemporary studies have largely supported the worse outcomes with typically a quarter of patients suffering acceleration of renal disease. 85% of pregnancies were successful.
The next section is on nephrotic syndrome. The authors oint out that albumin physiologically falls 0.5-1.0 g/dL in pregnancy, so patient with proteinuria may slip into nephrotic syndrome as the serum albumin falls further. This is called cyclic nephrotic syndrome of pregnancy. Though there is some disent in the literature, the consensus is that nephrotic syndrome alone does not result in poor outcomes.
Kand L then examine the renal biopsy. They recounted the 1965 paper “Bleeding after renal biopsy in Pregnancy” which described poor outcomes after 77 renal biopsies in pregnancy:
  • 16.7% gross hematuria
  • 4.4% perirenal hematomas
  • one maternal death
Kand L discuss their own reviews of the literature which found major biopsy complications occur during transperitoneal renal biopsies done during c-sections, biopsies with uncorrected coagulation abnormalities and biopsies with uncontrolled hypertension. They thern reported the excellent results at Chicago Lying-in Hospital with 3.5% hematuria following 400 biopsies.
In 1987 Packham and Fairley reported on 111 biopsies with a hematuria rate of only 0.9%.
They conclude that biopsey is safe in pregnancy.
They recommended biopsy in the following situation:
  • sudden deterioration of renal function before 32 weeks
  • symptomatic nephrotic syndrome before 32 weeks
They woud defere biopsy when there is
  • proteinuria alone, with normal blood pressure and normal renal function.
  • hematuria alone, with normal blood pressure and normal renal function.
They argue that active sediment (red and or white cell casts) is a relative indication for biopsy as a diagnosis of scleroderma would prompt termination of the pregnancy.
Management
  • basic metabolic profile
  • BUN
  • albumin
  • fasting lipid profile
  • 24-hour urine for:
    • creatinine
    • protein
  • uric acid
  • AST/ALT, LDH
  • PT, PTT, INR
  • CBC d/p
The patient should be followed every 2 weeks until week 32 and weekly after that. Renal parameters should be checked at least every month.
Summary:

Nephrotic syndrome + blood clots = membranous nephropathy

I have a patient with nephrotic syndrome, renal vein thrombosis and two pulmonary embolisms in the last year. I told him that the nephrotic syndrome was likely due to membranous nephropathy and that all of his various blood clots are due to the kidney disease. The biopsy came back today and it is indeed membranous nephropathy.

Membranous nephropathy is a common finding when patients are biopsied for nephrotic syndrome. Fortunately, it is a relatively benign disease with a significant number of spontaneous remissions. (Schieppati, NEJM 1993)

Adequate renal function was defined as “no ESRD”

Since there are so many spontaneous remissions and the therapy has significant side-effects we risk stratify patients in order to spare low-risk patients from treatment.

Higher risk

  • older age (over 60) (Medline)
  • male sex
  • nephrotic range proteinuria
  • greater than 8-10 g/day for more than 6 months (PDF)
  • increased serum creatinine (Cr over 1.5) (Medline)
Though the instinct after getting a kidney biopsy is to start therapy immediately, in patients with a normal creatinine, waiting for 6 months and monitoring the creatinine and proteinuria does not alter the patients response to treatment. (Medline)

The biopsy findings have long been held of major importance on predicting prognosis but an analysis of 389 biopsies questioned whether histology provided information that independently predicted prognosis. (Medline)

Two urinary findings are gaining acceptance at being able to better predict the clinical course of disease. Beta-2 microglobulin excretion greater than 0.5 mcg/min and IgG excretion over 250 mg per day (others use the more sesitive value of 125 mg/24 hours) have both been associated with increased risk of renal progression. (Medline)

Treatment

Treatment recomendations are based on the probability of progression.

Low Risk
For patients with a low risk of progressing the recommendation is to stay and pray.

  • Monitor the creatinine
  • Institute non-specific antiproteinuric therapy (ACEi, ARB, aldosterone antagonists)
  • Control the lipids
  • Tight blood pressure control
Moderate risk
These patient should be initiaed on the Ponticelli or modified Ponticelli protocol. This calls for three consecutive two-month cycles of cytotoxic therapy.
  1. Day 1-3: 1 gram of methylprednisolone. This is usually done as an inpatient.
  2. Day 4-30: Oral prednisone, 0.5 mg/kg daily
  3. Day 31-60: Oral cyclophosphamide 2 mg/kg (chlorambucil in the original Ponticelli)
High risk
Less data is available. Modified Ponticelli maybe appropriate but others recommend cyclosporin.
For patients with resistant disease there is no consensus on what is best and a list of what’s been tried looks like a line up of the usual suspects, nephrology edition.

CJASN published an excellent review of membranous nephropathy (Medline).

Has anybody seen this?

I have two patients who routinely have significantly lower spot protein to creatinine ratios as compared to 24-hour urine for protein.

The urine electropheresis shows non-specific proteinuria.

  • The first patient is an obese young African American woman with WHO type V lupus nephritis.
  • The other patient is a thin young Caucasian woman with secondary FSGS due to chronic reflux. Her most recent PCR is 1.7, and her 24-hour urine from one week prior is 4.9 g.

Any ideas? What am I missing?

ACTH for membranous nephropathy

Once you go beyond the modified Ponticelli, the treatment of idiopathic membranous feels like hunting in the woods. I have a woman in her late thirties who I have been treating for almost three years. She has between 6 and 10 grams of proteinuria, no renal failure (Cr or 0.8 and stable) no hypertension, and a middling albumin with terrible lipids. She doesn’t get much edema and is able to limit her use of loop diuretics to very occasionally.

We started with conservative therapy for 6 months to see where the proteinuria is going. After that we decided to give treatment a try because of the heavy proteinuria. She also had high levels of urinary IgG and urine beta-microglobulin.

She was reluctant to use cyclophosphamide because of concerns about future fertility. And I’m reluctant to use it in a young patient especially for a disease which is causing her minimal problems right now.

We started with MMF. Little effect.

We then gave a trial of CSA. Little effect.

We gave a trial of Pentoxifylline (Trental). little effect

What now? Tacro? Rituximab?

Anyone have any experience with ACTH?


I must say I have been seduced by the preliminary data (case series, rct) on ACTH. To me it looks more compelling than the alternatives (rituximab and tacro). The fact you have to go to a specialty pharmacy to get the stuff is a little intimidating.

Link to a description of membranous nephropathy from a lecture I give on Hep B, C and HIV associated renal pathology.

Two Ell

This month I’m attending on the renal ward at Saint John Hospital and Medical Center. I have a huge team: one fellow, one second year resident, three interns (2 categorical and one ER resident) and two medical students. I have been having a blast teaching them.

I am going to track all of the teaching I do this month here.

So far this is the formal (as opposed to bedside) teaching we have done:

Monday June 2: Introduction to Two-Ell
Tuesday June 3: Nephrotic Syndrome
Wednesday June 4: Dialysis basics and Anti-hypertensive agents saves lives
Thursday June 5: Renal Adventures in Imaging (the nephrologic implications of Gadolinium and NFD, phosphate nephropathy as a complication of colonoscopy prep, and contrast nephropathy)

Adventures in Renal Imaging

More to come.